Gutsense Header

Why Taking Calcium Doesn’t Prevent Osteoporosis

When it comes to osteoporosis, you are set to fail from the start because its prevention is built on myths that mislead patients and doctors alike. For starters, the advice to take more calcium doesn’t prevent it, and taking high doses of vitamin D may actually increase calcium loss.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg. If you eat a low-fat diet to stay slim, avoid red meat to prevent heart disease, take statins to lower cholesterol, avoid salt to lower blood pressure, stay out of the sun to prevent skin cancer, and drink eight glasses of water to stay hydrated, you are unknowingly speeding up the progression of osteoporosis and related conditions that cause bone loss.

And since most Americans are doing the same, the prevalence of osteoporosis-related bone loss reaches staggering 78% among women after menopause and 27% among men over fifty. And it’s not as if a switch flips the moment you turn fifty. Actually, bone loss quietly begins in your thirties and forties.

The prevalence of osteoporosis in women isn't higher because of menopause itself, but because of pregnancies, breastfeeding, chronic dieting, low-fat eating, overhydration, and the greater tendency to observe nutritional dogmas promoted by doctors, peers, and dietary authorities. 

But the worst part of it comes from approximately two million fractures that occur each year in the United States among adults over fifty. Most strikingly, vertebral (spinal) fractures account for about 27%, followed by wrist fractures at 19%, hip fractures at 14%, pelvic fractures at 7%, and all other sites combined at 33%  [link].

I wrote “most strikingly” because vertebral fractures usually require surgical stabilization or prolonged bracing to immobilize the spine, and they frequently lead to long-term disability and chronic back pain.

Hip fractures are even more devastating! Approximately 300,000 hip fractures occur in the United States annually. The one-year mortality after hip fracture is roughly 60,000 deaths among women, compared with about 42,000 annual deaths from breast cancer. For men, the one-year mortality rate following a hip fracture is nearly twice as high.

Wrap your head around it — if you’re a woman, your risk of dying after a hip fracture is higher than your risk of dying from breast cancer. And for men, that risk exceeds the mortality from prostate cancer [link].

Yet almost no one knows about these risks, or does anything meaningful to protect themselves, except for taking more calcium and vitamin D, which only creates an illusion of prevention and won't reverse osteoporosis or prevent fractures.

And osteoporosis is only part of this sad story. Its other chapters are osteomalacia and osteoarthritis, which are just as bad for your health and longevity. I call it "sad" because all three conditions are entirely avoidable, preventable, and even reversible as long as you don't wait for a fracture to knock you down. Let me explain!

Let’s Get the Facts Straight

Osteopenia is the early stage of bone loss that precedes osteoporosis. After a certain point, osteopenia progresses into osteoporosis. This condition is evident to the naked eye through shrinking facial bones, reduced height, and fractures of the spine, hips, and limbs.

Osteopenia and osteoporosis are both diagnosed based on bone mineral density (BMD) results from a DXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) scan, but they differ in the degree of bone loss.

This table describes the diagnostic criteria. A T-score is a numerical result from a bone mineral density (BMD) test that compares your bone density with that of a healthy 30-year-old adult of the same sex:

Category

T-score

Description

Normal bone density

T-score ≥ −1.0

Bone mass is within 1 standard deviation of the mean value for young adults

Osteopenia

T-score between −1.0 and −2.5

Mild-to-moderate reduction in bone density, considered low bone mass but not yet osteoporosis

Moderate Osteoporosis

T-score ≤ −2.5

Marked reduction in bone density, associated with a significantly increased fracture risk

Severe osteoporosis

T-score ≤ −2.5 plus 1 or more fragility fractures

Indicates advanced bone loss with clinical fracture evidence

The Z-score is an alternative measurement that compares the patient’s BMD to an age- and sex-matched population, used in epidemiological studies or for diagnosing osteoporosis in younger individuals.

The Sieve of Untruth About Porous Bones

Osteoporosis is a progressive loss of bone tissue that degrades the bone matrix. It is the organic framework that gives bones structure and resilience. Without it, bones lose strength and fracture easily, no matter how much calcium or magnesium they contain.

No, I haven’t lost my mind. And this isn’t clickbait or some “alternative theory” I invented to grab your attention. My statement is fully consistent with the definition of osteoporosis in The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy, the self-proclaimed “Gold Standard” for Western physicians, students, and researchers:

Osteoporosis: A generalized, progressive diminution of bone density (bone mass per unit volume), causing skeletal weakness, although the ratio of mineral to organic elements is unchanged.

That quote, incidentally, came from the 17th edition of The Merck Manual (1999), around the same time I was researching this topic for the first time for my first Russian-language book, Functional Nutrition.

In plain language, it means exactly what I said: the minerals are still there — “the ratio of mineral to organic elements is unchanged” — but there is less bone tissue to hold those minerals. No amount of calcium or magnesium can rebuild bones if the bone matrix, their structural foundation, is gone.

The most recent 20th edition (2018) goes even further in obscuring the real origin of osteoporosis by rewriting the definition as follows:

Osteoporosis is a progressive metabolic bone disease that decreases bone mineral density (bone mass per unit volume), with deterioration of bone structure [link].

What’s so patently wrong about this definition? Two things:

First, it refers to a physiological process of aging as a “disease” so that pharmaceutical companies can market drugs to “treat” it.

Second, it defines osteoporosis as a decrease in bone mineral density without specifically acknowledging the loss of bone matrix that holds those minerals together.

For a casual reader, this might seem like a minor semantic issue, but it isn’t. That linguistic sleight of hand — calling a natural process a disease and framing it as mineral loss — has misled doctors and patients alike for decades. By shifting focus to mineral deficiency, it diverts attention from the real, preventable cause: the gradual loss of the bone matrix.

In fact, in clinical research, taking calcium and vitamin D alone has shown minimal impact. In the largest U.S. trial involving over 36,000 women aged 50 to 79, seven years of supplementation increased bone density by just over 1%, with no meaningful reduction in hip fractures. [link].

Also, drug therapies offer almost no real benefit at a high cost. Bisphosphonates such as alendronate (Fosamax, made by Merck) or risedronate (Actonel, made by Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals) reduce fracture risk by only about 1%—meaning 100 women must be treated to prevent a single fracture—while causing gastrointestinal problems in up to 30% of patients and, in rare cases, atypical femur fractures or osteonecrosis of the jaw.  [link].

Exposing 100 women to a drug that might prevent one fracture but could also break a femur or destroy a jaw sounds like a joke—but hey, who am I to judge?

So, what’s wrong with the “calcium and vitamin D” or pharmaceutical logic?

Bone matrix (the same as bone tissue) is composed primarily of collagen and protein, not minerals. Collagen forms the framework of cartilage, tendons, ligaments, skin, teeth, blood vessels, and even the cornea and lens of the eye.

The body synthesizes collagen from animal-derived amino acids, primarily glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline, with the help of vitamin C, iron, zinc, copper, and other cofactors obtained from food, water, or supplements. When these nutrients are lacking, collagen production slows, bone remodeling falters, and bone tissue gradually weakens.

Osteoporosis rarely develops in isolation. It often coincides with other collagen-deficiency disorders such as arthritis, atherosclerosis, periodontal disease, fibromyalgia, tendon and ligament injuries, cataracts, glaucoma, and premature skin aging.

The word *collagen* comes from the Greek *kolla*, meaning “glue.” It’s the same glue once made by boiling animal bones and cartilage. When collagen is hydrolyzed in water, it becomes gelatin, the same substance that gives aspic, jellies, and many processed foods their gel-like consistency.

As collagen declines, bones lose their structural integrity and become porous. Porosity decreases the bone’s ability to retain minerals, further weakening its framework. And that is why no amount of supplemental calcium or vitamin D can help — once the bone tissue is gone, minerals have no place to store themselves.

This combination of tissue loss and mineral loss makes bones brittle and compressible. Fractures and gradual loss of height remain the two hallmark signs of osteoporosis.

Osteopenia and the early stage of osteoporosis are almost completely reversible because bone tissue remains metabolically active as long as a person is alive. Even after midlife, bone can regenerate if supplied with the raw materials for collagen formation and controlled mineralization.

Advanced osteoporosis is only partially reversible, but even in late stages, bone remodeling continues throughout life because bone resorption and formation occur continuously.

That process can succeed only if the body receives the raw materials it needs, such as essential amino acids, fatty acids, vitamins, minerals, and microelements that participate in bone tissue metabolism.

Even if your bones and joints still feel healthy, collagen deserves ongoing attention. It protects not only your skeleton but also your skin, arteries, heart, brain, hearing, and vision. Collagen decline underlies wrinkles, arterial stiffness, hearing loss, cataracts, and retinal damage, the same systemic breakdown that weakens bones.

As for calcium, magnesium, and vitamin D, they still matter too, but for different reasons. They prevent the softening and deformation of bones, not fractures. Mineral deficiency leads to bowed bones, not broken ones.

The Hard Truth About Soft Bones

Osteomalacia, literally “bone softness,” is a separate condition caused by insufficient vitamin D, calcium, or phosphate. In children, it’s called rickets; in healthy adolescents, it is called scoliosis, and, in adults, it remains osteomalacia. These bones bend rather than break because they lose the rigidity provided by minerals, not bone matrix density.

Calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and potassium are essential for bone mineralization, but their deficiency produces soft bones, not brittle ones. Osteoporosis, by contrast, is primarily a loss of the collagen matrix — the scaffolding that minerals attach to.

Doctors define scoliosis as a lateral curvature of the spine with a structural or functional rotation, not a softening of bone tissue. They insist that scoliosis isn’t caused by osteomalacia per se, but rather that it results from weakened bones or uneven growth.

Yet this reasoning collapses on itself: if weakened bones are the cause, and osteomalacia is the process that weakens them, then separating the two is pure semantics. The loss of minerals and the resulting bone softness is the very mechanism that allows the spine to deform in an otherwise healthy teenager.

In teenagers with acute malnutrition, scoliosis can indeed result from both bone matrix reduction and mineral loss at the same time, but that’s a rarity nowadays.

In osteomalacia, the overall volume of bone may paradoxically increase, yet its mineralization sharply declines. Although U.S. physicians are now recognizing osteomalacia as a bone disorder, it remains frequently underdiagnosed, particularly in older adults.

Because both processes — osteomalacia and osteoporosis — can occur together in aging adults, resulting in soft bones from mineral loss and porous bones from collagen loss, the distinction is often blurred until deformities and fractures start appearing.

The same overlap applies to osteoarthritis because cartilage, like bone, is built on collagen. Let’s touch on it briefly, because preventing and reversing osteoporosis and osteomalacia may, in many cases, have a similar positive impact on osteoarthritis.

The Fourth “Osteo-” of Collagen Deficiency

Osteoporosis, osteopenia, and osteomalacia all share a common origin — the gradual loss of the collagen matrix that supports bone structure. Osteoarthritis represents the fourth and final manifestation of the same degenerative process, this time affecting the cartilage that cushions the joints.

More than 53 million Americans now live with some form of degenerative, inflammatory, autoimmune, nutritional, or trauma-related arthritis.

According to the Merck Manual,

Osteoarthritis, the most common joint disorder, often becomes symptomatic in the 40s and 50s and is nearly universal (although not always symptomatic) by age 80. Only half of patients with pathologic changes of osteoarthritis have symptoms. Below age 40, most large-joint osteoarthritis occurs in men and often results from trauma or anatomic variation (eg, hip dysplasias). Women predominate from age 40 to 70, after which men and women are equally affected. [link].

For treatment, the same source recommends: “Treatment includes joint protection, rehabilitation with muscle strengthening, and medications to reduce pain.”

If you follow this advice blindly, you’re guaranteed to have more problems (and Merck to make more money), because none of these methods addresses the root causes of osteoarthritis. And while “muscle strengthening” can help in theory, when done without first restoring collagen, cartilage integrity, and joint lubrication, it only adds stress to an already damaged joint and accelerates its deterioration.

Rheumatoid arthritis is different. It’s an autoimmune disease that attacks connective tissues, particularly ligaments, tendons, and joint capsules—structures composed primarily of collagen. The joints are only one visible part of a wider systemic inflammation that often affects the entire body.

Just as with osteoporosis and osteomalacia, true prevention begins with restoring collagen metabolism through functional nutrition, adequate protein intake, targeted supplementation, and moderate physical activity that stimulates bone and joint renewal. Rheumatoid arthritis still requires medical care, but the same nutritional foundation remains indispensable for recovery and long-term maintenance.

Before moving on, it’s worth clearing up a few more popular myths about osteoporosis—beliefs so widespread that even most doctors repeat them ad nauseam.

Myths and Misconceptions

The mythology of osteoporosis goes far deeper than blaming it solely on calcium and vitamin D deficiencies. Let’s go over other myths:

Myth 1: Osteoporosis is just a function of age.

No, it isn’t. Age increases risk, but it isn’t the cause. Not all older people develop osteoporosis, and the disease is now showing up earlier—even in young adults and adolescents. When it appears in the young, doctors call it idiopathic osteoporosis, meaning “of unknown cause,” although its roots are largely nutritional and metabolic.

Bone loss reflects a chronic imbalance between bone formation and bone resorption, often driven by protein deficiency, hormonal changes, inflammation, oxidative stress, and lack of key micronutrients—not by age itself.

Myth 2: Osteoporosis is caused by menopause.

No, it doesn’t. Pregnancies, lactation, low-fat and low-protein health food, weight loss diet, overhydration, indigestion, heartburn medications, age-related diminished assimilation, avoiding sunlight, and chronic undernutrition happen long before the menopause, and by 50, their collective outcomes culminate in osteopenia and osteoporosis. Post-menopausal women in traditional societies with higher protein and fat intake rarely experience the same degree of bone loss as modern Western women.

While acknowledging this as ‘anecdotal evidence,’ my 70-year-old wife, who has followed the same diet and taken the same supplements for the past 25 years, is free of osteopenia, osteomalacia, and osteoarthritis.

Myth 3: Osteoporosis is genetic.

Not true. Genetics influences the initial bone structure and peak bone mass, but lifestyle determines bone loss. What families truly “inherit” are eating patterns, water quality, physical habits, and environment. Nutrition, activity, and sunlight explain most of the variance in bone health across populations, not DNA.

Myth 4: Osteoporosis is incurable.

Not true. It’s not a disease in the infectious sense, but an age-related degenerative process. Bone tissue can regenerate at any age if the body receives the necessary collagen precursors. Even severe cases can stabilize or partially reverse. If bone tissue couldn’t regenerate, fractures would never heal.

Myth 5: Osteoporosis is caused by inactivity.

Not true. Bone responds to gravity and the impact of exercise, but only when supported by adequate protein and micronutrients. Studies show that even athletes can develop osteoporosis if their diet lacks sufficient collagen-forming nutrients. Exercise helps mainly because it stimulates appetite, circulation, and bone remodeling, but movement alone can’t rebuild the bone tissues.

Myth 6: Osteoporosis is caused by eating meat or saturated fat.

Total nonsense. The U.S. osteoporosis epidemic grew in parallel with the war on cholesterol and saturated fat, the high-carbohydrate dietary revolution of the late twentieth century. Despite decades of “heart-healthy” messaging, Americans are more calcium-supplemented, medicated, and osteoporotic than ever. According to the National Osteoporosis Foundation (2023), about 10 million Americans have osteoporosis, and 44 million more have osteopenia—roughly half of all adults over fifty.

Research now confirms that higher protein intake, especially from animal sources, supports better bone density, improved calcium absorption, and reduced fracture risk.

Saturated fats also play an indirect role by maintaining hormones necessary for bone formation. The “fat-free” and “meat-free” fads weakened both metabolism and skeletal resilience.

Modern science reinforces what common sense once knew: bone tissue isn’t built from breakfast cereal. They’re built from proteins, collagen precursors, healthy fats, and the minerals that comes from water, food, and supplements.

Rebuilding the Bones

Once the myths are stripped away, what remains is simple physiology: bones can rebuild only when the body has the raw materials and conditions required to produce new bone matrix and fill it with minerals. The goal isn’t “stronger bones” by taking drugs, but restoring bone metabolism.

I mentioned at the beginning that if you follow a low-fat diet to prevent obesity, take statins to protect your heart, avoid salt to lower your blood pressure, stay out of the sun to prevent skin cancer, and drink eight glasses of water a day to stay hydrated, you are unknowingly doubling or even tripling the progression of osteoporosis, osteomalacia, and countless other conditions that accompany or stimulate bone loss. Take care of those issues first:

And focus on the following things that you can manage on your own:

If your time is limited and money is plentiful, request a consultation. Reversing and preventing osteoporosis is a gradual process that requires individualized assessment, thorough preparation, and ongoing adjustments.

Key Takeaways

The following points summarize the most important lessons from this article — what truly causes bone loss, why conventional prevention fails, and what you can do differently starting today:

Don't wait for the first fracture! Prevention is still far easier, cheaper, and more reliable than wearing a cast and riding a wheelchair.

Frequently Asked Questions

The purpose of this section is to clarify the points that most readers raise after reviewing the material in this publication.

Q. How long does it take to increase bone density using your approach?+

Bone density recovery depends on age, digestive efficiency, regular use of high-quality supplements, the amount and quality of dietary protein, hormonal status, and how well nutrients are absorbed. For most people, measurable improvement begins within six to twelve months, though the timeline varies widely.

Q. How can I be sure that your recommendations work?+

Use an identical DXA (formerly DEXA) scan every two years, ideally on the same device and at the same anatomical site. The results will allow you to track real changes and determine how long it takes for you personally to reach normal bone density.

Q. My doctor has reviewed your approach but insists I continue taking medication.+

Drug therapy should meet three basic criteria: proven effectiveness, acceptable safety, and curative potential. No current osteoporosis drug satisfies all three. Bisphosphonates and hormonal modulators can modestly reduce fracture risk, but they do not restore healthy bone structure and carry well-documented adverse effects.

Q. Does your program have side effects?+

None. My recommendations are nutritional, not pharmacological. The diet closely follows—or improves upon—the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) established by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Institutes of Health. Supplements in the suggested ranges are recognized as safe when used appropriately.

Q. Should I continue taking Fosamax?+

That decision should be made with your physician, but the prescribing information clearly lists serious side effects, including gastrointestinal injury and jaw necrosis, with minimal gains in bone strength. Bisphosphonates may appear to increase bone density on scans because they suppress turnover, not because they rebuild bone.

Q. What about hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or drugs like Evista (raloxifene)? Are they considered first-line treatments for osteoporosis?+

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) such as raloxifene (Evista) can modestly improve bone mineral density and reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women, but they are not considered first-line treatments for osteoporosis in most current guidelines.

Clinical studies have shown that raloxifene increases bone density by only about 2% to 4% after three years, a gain so small it falls within the margin of measurement error for standard bone density scans. Because of this limited efficacy and combined with higher risks of blood clots and stroke,  these drugs are now used selectively, rather than as primary therapy [link].

Q. So, should I take calcium, and what kind?+

Yes, you should. Calcium supports bone mineralization, but it doesn’t rebuild bone tissue or prevent osteoporosis on its own. For calcium to stay in the bones, it must be accompanied by magnesium, vitamin K₂, vitamin C, vitamin A, and the B-complex vitamins that drive collagen synthesis and mineral metabolism.

The supplements for osteopenia, osteoporosis, osteomalacia, and osteoarthritis are the same as I recommended in the prior article about back pain:

  • Calcium Magnesium Capsules on the days you don’t take magnesium powder from the Hydro-CM set [link];

  • Buffered Vitamin C Capsules on the days you don’t take vitamin C powder from the Hydro-CM set [link].

  • Coenzymated Once-Daily Multi Complex [link] to provide all of the critical co-factors required for the synthesis of collagen.

  • Cod Liver Oil Liquid, which provides essential fatty acids and natural vitamins A and D [Amazon].

  • Vitamin D-3 capsules if you don’t take cod liver oil, or if you live in a northern region and don’t get sufficient sun exposure during autumn, winter, and spring [link].

  • Coenzymated Methyl B-12 Vitamin [link]  because it is critical for the prevention of anemias that also adversely affect bone health.

Q. What is the role of physical activity in preventing osteoporosis and osteoarthritis?+

Exercise supports overall health but is not the main determinant of bone strength. Weight-bearing movement maintains bone mass only when paired with adequate protein and micronutrient intake. It is less effective—and sometimes harmful—in advanced osteoarthritis. Physiotherapy is distinct: it improves joint mobility through controlled, low-stress movements without mechanical strain.

The supposed link between exercise and bone health came from comparing two extremes—professional athletes and sedentary older adults. Athletes have stronger bones mainly because they are better nourished and hormonally balanced, not because of exercise alone. In fact, athletes—particularly those in impact sports—show high rates of osteoarthritis and stress fractures later in life.

Older adults, especially those immobilized or institutionalized, lose bone rapidly, but poor diet, medication use, and chronic illness play greater roles than inactivity itself. Similar bone loss is seen in astronauts during prolonged microgravity, again due to the absence of weight-bearing stress combined with nutrient depletion—an exception, not a rule.

For healthy, active people, ordinary movement under gravity supplies all the stimulus bones need to maintain structure. Specific training that overloads certain joints can strengthen local bone but deplete minerals elsewhere if the diet is inadequate. Massage therapists, for example, often develop extremely strong hands but experience hip or spine degeneration—a classic sign of nutrient redistribution under stress.

High-impact exercise, particularly running, accelerates joint wear in predisposed individuals. Microtrauma from repetitive motion is one reason nearly all professional runners and football players develop osteoarthritis before middle age. Inadequate recovery, dehydration, and mineral loss from sweating further worsen the damage.

Moderate physical activity—daily walking, stretching, and light resistance work—remains ideal. It promotes appetite, digestion, circulation, and metabolic balance, all essential for bone and joint renewal.

Q. My mother has advanced osteoporosis, and my father has osteoarthritis. Does that mean I will, too?+

No, not if you change the conditions that caused theirs. Genetics influence bone structure slightly, but environment and nutrition determine outcomes. Parents shape a child’s diet and lifestyle during the years when bone mass is formed, which is why “family history” often reflects habits, not DNA. If you keep eating and living the way they did, you’ll inherit their health problems by choice, not by genes.

Strong bones are laid down long before birth. A thoughtful mother builds her child’s skeleton through her own diet and nutrient reserves; a careless one borrows minerals from her own bones and teeth. A healthy mother means a healthy child—and often the health of the next generation.

Q. What role does geography play in bone and joint health?+

The closer you live to the equator, the lower your risk of bone loss. Year-round sunlight promotes vitamin D synthesis; diets near the tropics tend to be richer in seafood and protein; and groundwater in coastal or equatorial regions usually contains more trace minerals. These are called endemic factors—environmental influences that define local health patterns.

For people in northern latitudes, sunlight deficiency can be offset with daily vitamin D, while dietary protein and mineral gaps are easily corrected with proper supplementation. In short, your location shapes your needs but doesn’t dictate your destiny.

Q. What kind of diet do you recommend for osteoporosis prevention? It isn't clear from your article?+

The difference between my work and that of most people who write about nutrition is that I do not recommend a single, universal diet — because such a thing simply doesn't exist. People differ by age, ethnicity, occupation, lifestyle, state of health, dietary preference (vegan, vegetarian, pescatarian, carnivore, omnivore), religious considerations (kosher, halal), food allergies, and countless other individual factors and limitations.

Knowing all that, there is no realistic way to recommend one diet that would suit all of my readers — or even all members of a single family — without risking offense or, worse, harm to those whose needs and preferences differ from my own. To work around these limitations, I've always focused on teaching the principles of optimal nutrition, so readers can adapt and apply them within their own dietary and lifestyle frameworks.

This particular essay — 45 Timeless Recommendations for Bulletproofing Your Gut Against Wrong Food and Bad Habits — is the perfect primer for that approach and a practical guide to adapting your diet to your individual health needs.

Another major point where I diverge from conventional American dietary dogma is my rejection of the belief that all necessary nutrients can be obtained from food alone. That doctrine has left more than 75% of Americans overweight or obese and over 110 million affected by type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. In other words, you can try to get all the nutrients you need from food — but the price of doing so is far too high.

This is why I take supplements myself and recommend the same to everyone past thirty. I explain the reasoning behind this recommendation in another essay: How to Self-Diagnose Nutritional Disorders.

I also dedicated the last three chapters of Fiber Menace — my English-language book — to the dietary principles required for recovery from functional, lifestyle-related digestive disorders.

Another work closely related to this article is my essay How to Prevent Premature Aging of Your Face, which focuses on collagen's role in skin health — the very same collagen that forms the structural framework of your bones.

Between these five works — and the rest of my Health Guides and materials on digestive disorders — you'll have everything you need to optimize your diet for the best possible protection of your bones, joints, muscles, and the ligaments that support them.

Let me conclude this long answer with the following thought: Over the years, you've probably read dozens of diet books — each one promising a gut of steel and eternal youth. Yet none of them seem to have delivered, because you're still here, still searching…

Author’s Note

If you’ve read this far, you probably realize that the very system meant to protect your health often does the opposite. And if you happen to be a medical professional, the irony runs even deeper because the educational, licensing, and Continuing Medical Education systems have conditioned generations of doctors to follow protocols that unintentionally damage their own and their patients’ bones.

In my own case, at 71 (October 2025), my bone health remains the same as it was in my 20s and 30s. I have no signs or symptoms of bone disease. The most obvious sign of osteoporosis for a man my age is height loss. Mine is still the same as it was when I arrived in the United States in 1978.

The reasons behind this “miracle” are explained in my essay Why You Should Trust Me. I hope that reading my backstory will encourage you to take similar steps and achieve the same level of resilience I’ve maintained for the past 25 years.

Unfortunately, by the time I figured all that out, it was too late to help my parents. My late mother (b. 1921) developed bowed legs in her sixties, and back then no one could explain why. She was absolutely devastated by the deformity, and to make matters worse, she had lost about four to five inches in height.

My late father (b. 1915) underwent double knee replacement surgery in his early eighties, never fully recovered, and eventually ended up in a nursing home because he could no longer walk on his own. He passed away in 2001.

Had I known then what I know now, my mother would never have developed osteomalacia, and my father would never have developed osteoarthritis.

I hope this article helps you and those you care about most avoid a similar misfortune. Share it with your adult children, partner, parents, and grandparents, so they too can understand what truly causes bone loss and what can be done to prevent it. 

***

If this free article gave you insight into a topic rarely covered by mainstream medical media objectively and in similar depth, that's no accident. I work independently and have no financial ties to pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, or institutional sponsors.

That independence allows me to present the facts without having to serve anyone's agenda. If you find this approach valuable for your well-being, the best way to support my work is by sharing this article with others.

Every repost, forward, or mention helps amplify the reach and makes future work like this possible. Thank you for taking the time to read and for supporting my work!